Why Else Was Instant Messenging Invented, If Not To Discuss Doctor Who?
Posted 24 April 2009 in Doctor Who by Catriona
I don’t have a real reason for posting this. It’s not quite a strange conversation. It’s just that as we were having this conversation, the following thoughts ran through my head:
This is interesting: I’d not thought about Time Lords quite like this before.
I wonder if I should post something along these lines on the blog?
Would people be interested in that?
Hmm, that might be quite a bit of work, though.
What button is it to cut and paste? Control or command?
And, yes: I genuinely am this verbose on IM.
ME: Sweetie, Romana is dead.
NICK: Well, probably. But you’d have thought the same about the Rani.
ME: No, because the Rani comes under the same category as the Master.
She’s an outlaw. Why would she go back to fight for Gallifrey? The Master wouldn’t if they hadn’t resurrected him specifically for that purpose. So she would never have been involved in the Time War.
NICK: Yes that’s true.
ME: Romana would have been.
NICK: True.
ME: As Susan would have been. They have social consciences that the Master and the Rani never had.
NICK: I wouldn’t be surprised if we see a full-blown resurrection of the Time Lords at some point though. It’s too tempting for someone not to do.
ME: Yeah—I’d love to see that, in a way. You know? But, at the same time, this new series is predicated on that all being gone. So it would also be a cop-out, and I might shout a little bit.
NICK: I know. That’s very much the danger of such a move. A lot of the authentic emotion of the new series derives from it. It’s made the Time Lords seem a lot grander than they ever did in the flesh.
ME: Well, and they are a lot grander now than they were.
NICK: That’s true too.
ME: The Time Lords in the original series were grandiose. But they were also atrophied.
NICK: Yeah.
ME: And the original series never shied away from that. That’s why the Doctor fled, really.
NICK: Yes, though the mise en scene distinction between atrophied and spangly was always a difficult one.
ME: Well, yes. I’ll give you that. Those collars, though! Magnifique!
NICK: Oh yeah. That is why James Acheson got Academy Awards after leaving the BBC.
ME: The costuming was awesome. And it reinforced the fact that they were an atrophied species, that they were so secure (metaphorically) in their self-righteousness and (literally) in their dome that they never needed to fear attack. No species fearing attack would wear collars they couldn’t turn their head in. The Time Lord collars are their “brains in the hand.”
NICK: That’s genius. Maybe the collars were bulletproof too?
ME: Maybe? Who uses guns in the Whoverse? Apart from humans.
NICK: True. Stasers were used on Gallifrey.
ME: And we know Time Lords aren’t bullet proof—poor 7th Doctor.
NICK: Yes, indeed.
Share your thoughts [4]
1
richard wrote at Apr 29, 05:42 am
Wow! Just, just… wow.
2
Catriona wrote at Apr 29, 06:58 am
I’m assuming this is awe at our extreme Doctor Who knowledge, Richard, and not horror at our geekiness.
3
Richard wrote at Apr 29, 07:53 am
A little from column A, a little from column…
Actually, I had the following mental conversation going on:
That’s right. Yeah, that’s right.
She’s right. He’s right.
Oh yes, that’s exactly right. Well, of course! Why didn’t I think of…
OMG: they’re right! Yes! Yes! Mise en what now? Magnifique? Touche!
Precisel – What? Brains in the hand – That’s. Exactly. Right.
Yes, indeed, indeed.
4
Catriona wrote at Apr 29, 09:27 am
Nick and I agree pretty thoroughly on issues of politics and religion. But we occasionally have broad-ranging and serious disagreements on the extent to which the Doctor Who New Adventures novels are canonical.
We’re a bit odd like that.