Seriously?
Posted 9 October 2008 in Reading by Catriona
I discovered an interesting fact today, while reading an Encyclopaedia of English Literature during a quick lunch.
Arthur had a sword called Excalibur.
No, that’s not the interesting fact I’m trying to impart here. I’m just establishing the well-known details first.
In Geoffrey of Monmouth’s account, Excalibur was called “Caliburn.”
Arthur also, in this account, had a shield called Pridwen, on which was painted an image of the Virgin Mary.
He also carried, in his right hand, a spear.
Called Ron.
Don’t believe me? Geoffrey of Monmouth’s account is quoted here, which is convenient, because I can’t find my copy:
Arthur himself put on a leather jerkin worthy of so great a king. On his head he placed a golden helmet, with a crest carved in the shape of a dragon; and across his shoulders a circular shield called Pridwen, on which there was painted a likeness of the Blessed Mary, Mother of God, which forced him to be thinking perpetually of her. He girded on his peerless sword, called Caliburn, which was forged in the Isle of Avalon. A spear called Ron graced his right hand; long, broad in the blade, and thirsty of slaughter.
Now, I don’t know the etymology of the word “Ron.” If anyone does, I’d be thrilled to hear it. At the moment, I’m too busy giggling to look it up.
I do know that if I were Pridwen, I’d be pretty annoyed that Excalibur hogs all the glory while no one remembers my name.
But if I were Ron?
Ooh, I’d be furious with whoever named me.
Share your thoughts [2]
1
Matthew Smith wrote at Oct 13, 04:08 am
It’s clearly a Harry Potter reference.
2
Catriona wrote at Oct 13, 07:00 am
That’s one retroactive Harry Potter reference. I wonder if The Guinness Books of Records knows about that?