by Catriona Mills

Real-Time Blogging Doctor Who, Season One: Rose

Posted 11 January 2009 in by Catriona

This should be interesting. We haven’t even put the disc in yet and Nick is already complaining. Mind, I agree with him there: the TARDIS-shaped box takes up an enormous amount of space, and the glue perished very quickly, so the insets keep falling out. I’m quite glad that the others didn’t come in, say, a Dalek-shaped box.

Nick’s now decided that these should be called recaps, but I don’t fancy doing that: I’m already a little uncomfortable, thinking about the fact that these have already been recapped on TWoP. But then I decided that, firstly, that didn’t mean I couldn’t do it, as well, and, secondly, I never cared for those recaps, anyway.

And all that before we get to the actual episode . . .

. . . which, of course, opens not with the Doctor, but with Rose (once we get past the opening credits, which were exciting enough in 2005, sixteen years after we’d last heard them on live telly, and with the slow panning down to London from outer space).

Rose, and her alarm clock—Rose looking terribly cute, actually, back before she started annoying me.

And the careful shots of the plastic dummies, just so we know what’s actually coming up.

Now Rose being adorable with Mickey on her lunch break, and now back to the work montage.

Ah, but now things are heating up, when Rose has to take the lottery money down to the basement to poor, dead, never-seen Wilson. (That’s not a spoiler, surely? Not four years on. Sorry, but Wilson is totally dead.) And you can tell it’s getting serious, because the very jaunty music has stopped as soon as the lift doors open.

Wow, I’m out of practice at this.

I find this whole scene in the basement very creepy, but then I’ve always found the (spoiler!) Autons terribly creepy. The horrible little dolls! And that black plastic armchair that suffocated people! The only thing that frightened me more in the original series was the Peking homunculus.

And now the dummies start moving, and they’re waaaay creepier than the stop-motion dolls from the 1970s. Even Rose is thoroughly freaked, backing away, until—the Doctor grabs her hand. “Run!”

Hurray!

Actually, the dummies look less realistic and less frightening when they’re running. For some reason, they look more like people and less like dummies/Autons when they’re running.

DOCTOR: Why would they be students?
ROSE: ‘Cause to get that many people dressed up and acting stupid, they have to be students.

I can’t argue with that.

And there goes the Doctor. Well, that was quick. Shall we assume he’ll be back at some point? Rose looks a little shell-shocked—and that’s before her place of work explodes, which it just did.

Well, you can’t argue with that: that’s what the Doctor does, just wanders in to a planet and creates massive quantities of chaos.

Jacki really is at her most annoying in this episode, with the nattering about Rose being “aged” and “skin like an old Bible” and “honestly, if you walked in now, you’d think I was her daughter.” I like her more in later episodes. And Mickey, too, though I don’t dispute his desire to go down the pub to see the match. Perfectly normal impulse—unless it’s Man. United playing. Or Chelsea. Or Arsenal.

Uh oh, strange scuttling sounds, and rattling cat flaps.

Oh, that’s okay—it’s only the Doctor poking through the cat flap. Which sounds like a euphemism, but isn’t.

I love this scene with Jacki:

JACKI: I’m in my dressing gown.
DOCTOR: Yes, you are.
JACKI: There’s a strange man in my bedroom.
DOCTOR: Yes, there is.
JACKI: Well, anything could happen.
DOCTOR: . . . No.

I also love the montage of the Doctor wandering around the living room while Rose makes coffee and natters on—checking his new face in the mirror (how long has it been since he regenerated?) and flipping the playing cards all over.

And if Mickey is being immature earlier in the episode, at least that explains Rose’s assumption that the Doctor is pretending to strangle himself with the plastic arm.

I wonder if this exchange between Rose and the Doctor

DOCTOR: Just “the Doctor”.
ROSE: Is that supposed to sound impressive?
DOCTOR: Yeah, sort of.

is a nod to the fact that this is the first new episode in sixteen years, a nod to all those new viewers out there who don’t automatically see the title sequence and think, “Well, obviously he’s the Doctor.)

I love Eccleston’s Doctor, the way he can flip between a thoroughly brittle manic mood, almost hysterical, to a sort of portentous solemnity that also has something hysterical about it. I’m writing this passage during the sequence when he’s walking back to the TARDIS (our first real glimpse of the TARDIS, though Rose runs past it in the street after the explosion—and the first time we hear it) when he’s explaining how he can feel the Earth hurtling through space, and that’s a good scene to explain what I mean about this Doctor.

I’ve lost the knack of explaining where the plot is while also rambling on about other things!

For the record, Rose has just checked out the Doctor on the Internet, and now Mickey is over-protectively driving her to see the chap who runs the Doctor website. (Well, his driving isn’t over-protective, but you get my point.)

I like Clive’s son—“Dad! It’s one of your nutters!”—but his wife’s “She? She read a website about the Doctor, and she’s a she?” just makes me a little cranky. (Yes, there are girl Doctor Who fans, and, no, you don’t need to assume that a Doctor Who convention is just going to be sad men in anoraks standing around shuffling their feet.)

Clive is showing his photographs and pictures to Rose, and Nick wonders what the Doctor was doing at Kennedy’s assassination. I wonder that, too. He wasn’t assassinating the U.S. President, presumably, so what?

Ah, the wobbly wheelie bin. No, Mickey, don’t get out of the car! You fool! Oh, you know something bad’s going to happen when it’s a wobbly wheelie bin.

This sequence with the bin isn’t entirely convincing to me—and as I type those words, Nick says, “You know, given the requirements, I don’t think ILM could have done better with that.” But the strips of plastic attached to Mickey’s hands I like—they’re kind of creepy and mundane at the same time, but the wobbling bin itself—especially in the panoramic shots—isn’t convincing.

Mickey’s post-Auton make-up is fabulous, though—the shift in the eyebrows and eyes and the shininess of the skin. I love it. Very uncanny (in a Freudian sense).

On the other hand, the scene where the cork hits Mickey in the forehead is deeply unconvincing.

(While Mickey wrecks the restaurant, I want to know more about this boy for whom Rose left school. Who was he? Why is he never mentioned again? Why would she have to leave school? I want back-story, dammit!)

And Rose is inside the TARDIS for the first time, and completely and utterly freaked out. Can’t say I blame her.

When did the assembled hordes of Ghengis Khan try to get through the TARDIS doors? I don’t remember that episode.

Oh, dear: Rose is breaking down. Poor girl.

Damn, these two are self-absorbed. We’ve already had Rose’s “I’m sorry, I thought we were talking about me” line at the dinner table, and now the Doctor’s insisting “Yeah, culture shock—oh, what? Your boyfriend? Oh, him.”

Sorry, Doctor: I love you, but Rose has a point—a Police Public Call Box is not a good disguise. It wasn’t even really a good disguise in the 1960s.

And now we have the first real running scene of the new season: the Doctor and Rose, tearing along hand-in-hand towards the London Eye. It reminds me, vaguely, of all the running through Paris that the Doctor (the Fourth) and Romana do in “City of Death.” As always, with Russell T. Davies, I wonder if it’s deliberate homage.

And they’re underneath the streets, looking down on the Nestene Consciousness.

NICK: This is a setting they keep coming back to. Spaceship interiors, cellars . . .
ME: I think it’s the new series’ quarry, myself.

Oh, and Mickey’s still alive. Which is good, I suppose, though Mickey didn’t grow on me for quite some time.

The Doctor probably shouldn’t call us “dumb apes” and “stupid little people,” when he’s always claimed to be so fond of us.

This scene is odd: this hysteria when he’s talking about the Time War in some detail for the first time is heart-breaking, but the image of the Doctor as a diplomat doesn’t really work for me here. Maybe because he’s not very good at diplomacy? Or perhaps he’s just tentative in the role here, coming out of an uncomfortable role as a soldier?

While I’m pondering that, vaguely, the Nestene Consciousness has activated its Auton warriors, and they’ve killed poor old Clive. Why? Because he’s the only person other than Jacki and Mickey that we’ve seen in any detail this episode, and the implication is that we’ll feel sorrier for someone we know? Or because they recognise that he, like Rose, has had contact with the Doctor, albeit virtually?

Of course, Jacki is at risk, too, from the hyper-creepy Auton brides.

But that’s all right, Rose knows what she needs to do. I do feel a little sorry for the Nestene Consciousness, though. It’s controlling the Autons, and the Autons have always been mindless killing machines, but it doesn’t look like a nice death—it looks intensely painful, and the poor thing is only a refugee from a destroyed planet.

Oh, well—it’s dead now, so there isn’t much point worrying about it.

Rose, when your mother is trying to tell you not to leave the house because it’s dangerous, you probably shouldn’t hang up on her. She’ll be having a panic attack right now.

Now, now, Mickey: aliens are people, too, in the broadest sense of the word.

And while I’m writing that, Rose is turning down a trip in what she thinks is a spaceship. Because she’s an idiot. Who seriously turns down a chance to travel in the TARDIS, even if their boyfriend isn’t invited? (Sorry, Nick!)

Ah, but when the Doctor turns up again and tells her it’s a time machine, as well, then she’s off—and I love that grin of sheer joy on her face. But that exchange with Mickey (“Thanks.” “For what?” “Exactly.”) doesn’t leave me with a good impression of the newest companion.

And that’s “Rose”! Sometime in the not too distant future (that is, probably next Sunday), it’ll be “The End of the World.”

Share your thoughts [12]

1

Nick Caldwell wrote at Jan 11, 07:55 am

All in all, it holds up pretty well. The pacing’s tighter than even a lot of recent episodes, the leads are great from the very start, and, as Steven Moffat is fond of pointing out, it’s incredibly efficient at introducing a complex premise and a large cast of characters in a very short period of time.

Tonally it’s not completely settled in — the farting wheelie bin seems even more out of place now than it did at the time and Mickey goes pretty wide in some scenes (for which I’d blame the director, who hasn’t worked for the show since his three this season). And visually, it’s a lot shinier and saturated than it would be by its second season.

2

Catriona wrote at Jan 11, 08:12 am

Actually, I thought the pacing was fairly slow for the first half, maybe the first third. This might not be a good technique for judging pacing, but I found that I had a lot of time to run off on tangents while not letting the plot get ahead of me for the first twenty minutes or so.

I don’t consider that a weakness, mind—it was setting up the scene and the characters, and it sped up in the second half.

It is shiny, isn’t it? I think that might have been a function of either its position as children’s programming (which often tends to be shinier than adult programming) or of the slightly unconvincing special effects. Or maybe just budget excitement.

Mickey’s charming in some scenes: I like the scene with him and Rose when Rose comes around to use his computer. But some scenes, you’re right, have pretty broad brushstrokes. He didn’t really grow on me for at least another season.

3

Drew wrote at Jan 11, 10:37 am

‘When did the assembled hordes of Ghengis Khan try to get through the TARDIS doors? I don’t remember that episode.”

I don’t think that there is one, but I’ve always loved that line.

“And now we have the first real running scene of the new season: the Doctor and Rose, tearing along hand-in-hand towards the London Eye.”

This is the one scene that really bothers me in the episode. Rose’s justified annoyance with the Doctor forgetting about her (as far as she knows) dead boyfriend is totally undermined by the looks of excitment and delight she is obviously feeling as they run across the bridge. At any other time, in this or any other episode it would have been it great shot, but it’s just wrong here where it’s placed.

I really like the Doctor’s “I am talking!” line as he attempts to play ambassador, kinda feeling that he is channeling Colin Baker at this point.

4

Catriona wrote at Jan 11, 10:47 am

No, Nick doesn’t think there was a Ghengis Khan episode, either, and if Nick doesn’t remember it, it almost certainly doesn’t exist. He can practically recite the dialogue for the lost episodes, never mind the ones that still exist.

I hadn’t thought about that scene on the bridge being disjointed in context: it makes sense, but then Rose is often a little selfish in this episode. (I don’t mean that as a broad indictment of her character and personality: she’s in a transitional period of her life, which is fair enough.) The scene that really bothers me, from the selfishness perspective, is the scene in the restaurant after Rose visits Clive. I mean, Mickey isn’t just acting a little odd, there. He isn’t just repeating himself. To take the most obvious example, there’s a definite glitch in his speech—the timbre, the intonation, everything is different, and it takes Rose a disturbingly long time to notice that her boyfriend looks and sounds completely different.

Christopher Eccleston as Colin Baker? I’m afraid I do have to shudder slightly at that idea: Colin Baker was treated very poorly by the show and, though I don’t want to go so far as to say he’s my least favourite Doctor, I do think that his era as Doctor is my least favourite—though that’s as much to do with Peri, Mel, and the extended “Trial of a Time Lord” storyline as it is with Colin Baker.

5

Tim wrote at Jan 11, 01:59 pm

Pacing: poor.

Effects: poor.

Plotting: poor.

Other things I didn’t like:

The Nestene Consciousness was unimpressive and looked nothing like the tentacle-y thing from the original series.

The business with the hand was daft.

It would make more sense for the Doctor to realise the Eye’s function, not Rose.

Rose doesn’t care about Mickey much, does she?

Simply seeing the Doctor on screen again made up for all of that, and Eccleston was brilliant.

6

Catriona wrote at Jan 11, 11:38 pm

I didn’t actually mind that the Nestene Consciousness didn’t look like the tentacle-y thing from the original series, because the tentacle-y thing from the original series didn’t impress me much, either. Plus, we don’t know what sort of time has passed for the species since that story: it could have evolved into a giant bowl of glowing soup over tens of thousands of years. Or millions.

That said, I didn’t really like the design, either. What I wasn’t thrilled with was the fact that it kept mimicking a human face. Why? It doesn’t look human. It could have been trying to present itself in a way that the Doctor would recognise, but that reading wasn’t actually written into the plot.

I didn’t mind the business with the hand, at all—but then, I am the kind of person who laughs at slapstick humour. If it’s done well.

The Rose/Mickey angle is my real problem. She not only doesn’t really seem to care about him, at all (and Drew’s point above supports that reading, too) but she’s downright nasty to him at the end. She’s already running off with another man—why does she need that little slap about him not doing anything for her?

But, then, Rose’s character her confuses me. Basically, it seem that they started out writing her as boy-crazy: the kind of girl who just likes having a boy around, is easily swept away by a new boy, regardless of the risks, or who’ll do anything daft for the boy she’s currently with. (That’s not meant to be an indictment of her character, just a description.) The fact that she left school for a boy sort of supports that, and, of course, her mother is a model for this behaviour, too. And it carries on through the first season, with the various pretty boys she picks up here and there.

But then at the same time, she doesn’t seem to treat any of them very well. Except the Doctor. So is it that she’s met the great, transcendent love of her life, and that’s it? She can treat everyone else badly now? Or is it just a degree of inconsistency in the character in these early stages?

7

Leigh wrote at Jan 12, 04:40 am

You know the nice bit about these realtime/live blogged episodes is that you learn things. I thought that the Doctor was calling it a nesting consciousness but now i know it was a Nestene consciousness :)

8

Catriona wrote at Jan 12, 04:48 am

Unfortunately, I can’t find a picture of the original, tentacle-y version from “Spearhead from Space.” But I did find a nice version of the Auton-mated (I crack myself up. Seriously.) shop dummies from Spearhead from Space.

I would include a picture of those creepy killer dolls from “Terror of the Autons,” but I can’t find one anywhere.

9

Drew wrote at Jan 12, 04:52 am

I would chalk it up to character inconsistency. I’ve always felt that Rose was designed to be that pretty girl in the shop who you felt that you just might have a chance with if you asked her out. She’s attractive, but she’s not Monica Bellucci. Part of that attraction might be that she seems to need a man in her life so that man might possibly be you. I think that this initially is her attraction for the general male viewing audience who like her, myself included of course. It’s certainly hard to imagine Joss Whedon writing such a character because Joss likes his women strong and independant, they like men, but they don’t need them. And Jackie here seems to reinforce that interpretation, sexually flirting with the Doctor the moment she sees him when she doesn’t actually know a single thing about him. And yet, in Season 3 she can say to “new Pete”: “there was never anyone but you.” Is she lying to herself, him, us or all three at once there? or she just trying to say that she still loves him after all this time? or is it simply just character inconsistency?

10

Catriona wrote at Jan 12, 05:17 am

Yes, I do think (and think I mentioned above) that Jackie is a model for any boy-craziness we might see in Rose: the fairly explicit propositioning of the Doctor in the first scene, and that rather disturbing vignette in “Aliens of London” where Jackie is trying to convince Rose to stay and promising that, if she does, Jackie won’t let her man friend come around any more (which hints at a tension between mother and daughter that we don’t see much of elsewhere).

And, of course, when Jackie says that to Pete, both Mickey and the Doctor roll their eyes and say, “Oh, please.” But there’s no reason why she can’t be telling the truth, as well. It depends on what she means by “anyone.” Anyone for what? After all, she was widowed very young and with an infant, but she never remarried, and I don’t think there’s even an indication that she ever lived with another man long-term, is there? That could be bad luck, or pickiness, or it could be a sign that Pete was genuinely the only one she could even imagine day-to-day living with.

(I’m not touching the Joss Whedon reference, though, to be fair, much of what I grew to dislike—while still enjoying the show—in the gender politics of Buffy happened after Joss relinquished real control over the show. But I do think it’s convenient that science fiction and fantasy were invented, otherwise I’m not sure Joss would have been able to reconcile his two fantasies: women who can beat up anything but only weigh ninety pounds soaking wet. Hard to do that without superpowers. That’s one of the reasons why I love Zoe so much.)

11

Tim wrote at Jan 12, 11:56 am

> I didn’t actually mind that the Nestene Consciousness didn’t look like the tentacle-y thing from the original series, because the tentacle-y thing from the original series didn’t impress me much, either.

Sure, the original tentacle effects were (if you’ll excuse me) ropey, but I was impressed at the time and would have liked to have seen a more modern reimagining. But like you, the blob taking a human face annoyed me more.

> But then at the same time, she doesn’t seem to treat any of them very well. Except the Doctor. So is it that she’s met the great, transcendent love of her life, and that’s it? She can treat everyone else badly now? Or is it just a degree of inconsistency in the character in these early stages?

It can’t be both? ;) But you know me, I’m always willing to chalk apparent inconsistencies up to bad writing and direction. :)

P.S.: Drew, when are you going to join the Dissero gaming group? :p

12

Catriona wrote at Jan 12, 01:11 pm

I agree on the first point. And, while I didn’t think to say this at the time, I do like it when they foreground the continuity with the original series, especially when they do it in a way that doesn’t necessarily disenfranchise the new viewers, but is a nice in-joke for us old fans—like the Macra in “Gridlock.”

The tentacles might have been a good place to do that.

(I’m going to keep an eye on consistencies of writing and direction in Rose’s character—and her mother and Mickey—on this new run-through of season one, though.)

Comment Form

All comments are moderated and moderation includes a non-spoiler policy based on Australian television scheduling.

Textile help (Advice on using Textile to format your comments)
(if you do not want your details filled in when you return)

Categories

Blogroll

Monthly Archive

2012
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
2011
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
August
October
November
December
2010
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
October
December
2009
January
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December
2008
February
March
April
May
June
July
August
September
October
November
December